🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was appropriate. Instead, he invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match who else sensibly had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are more than adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often helpless. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty severe restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, improbable advancements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and maintained the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very last eight match should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous chances to break. But the champion rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the brink of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use excessive effort to prevail. Facing match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly ironclad proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of Djokovic, that lost to Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially seem like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

The American is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States failing to produce a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in June of claiming a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that goal, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact highly unlikely for all other players. {