🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.